“Factually, the record in this case does not support a finding of racially discriminatory intent under any potentially applicable standard of review,” Patterson said.Īssociate Justice Phil Berger Jr., a Republican, questioned whether under Brachman’s viewpoint identical voter ID legislation could ever be approved. Rehearing a case is an option for the court when someone contends justices “overlooked or misapprehended” facts or laws, but it’s only happened two other times in the past 30 years, according to one justice. This latest edition of the court soon granted requests by Republican legislative leaders to rehear separate voter ID litigation and redistricting litigation decisions. But Republicans have held a 5-2 seat advantage since January, the result of two associate justice election victories in November by GOP candidates. That ruling was penned by the 4-3 Democratic majority on the court. The justices agreed last month to take a second look at the court’s December ruling that upheld a trial court ruling that declared a 2018 voter ID law was unconstitutional, tainted by racial bias and designed to help Republicans retain their grip on power at the General Assembly. (AP) - A photo voter identification mandate first sought over a decade ago by North Carolina Republicans could be revived after the state Supreme Court reheard on Wednesday a case that led a different combination of justices a few months ago to strike down a voter ID law.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |